Friday, October 14, 2011

Textile Industry - Corporate Debt Restructuring Crisis


As reported by The Hindu Business Line on 12 Oct 2011, in consultation with Ministry of Finance and the Reserve Bank of India, the Ministry of Textiles will work on formulating a restructuring plan for the textiles industry. The issues which are expected to be addressed in this restructuring plan will include moratorium on repayment of TUFS (Textile Upgradation Fund Scheme) loans, packing credit in foreign currency to be made available by banks, working capital assistance and interest subvention on export of textiles and clothing.
Mr A.B. Joshi, Textile Commissioner made a statement that the technical textiles industry has grown to Rs 63,000 crore in 2010-11 from Rs 43,000 crore in 2007-08, which accounts for 11 per cent growth a year and is expected to touch Rs 1,58,000 crore by 2016-17 at a growth rate of 20 percent a year. The Government in its 12th Five-Year Plan has allocated funds to the development of Centres of Excellence (CoE) for the various technical textiles sectors.

The Hindu Business Line on 11 Oct 2011 published an article stating that currently, the industry is undergoing a major re-orientation towards non-clothing applications of textiles such as thermal protection and blood-absorbing materials, seatbelts, adhesive tape, and other specialised products and applications. Furthermore, with the phasing out of the Multi-Fibre Arrangement, the Indian textile industry is optimistic due to new investment and Government initiatives.

Slowdown in demand, short-supply of raw materials, volatile commodity prices, overleveraged balance sheets, and rising interest rates, among others, are increasingly driving Indian companies to seek debt restructuring.  In the second quarter of the current financial year, the quantum of corporate debt that came up for restructuring with the banking industry-promoted corporate debt restructuring (CDR) Cell was about 12 times higher as compared with the corresponding year ago period.

Nineteen corporates with debt aggregating Rs 28,889 crore were referred to the CDR Cell for restructuring in quarter ended September 30, 2011, against 12 corporates with debt aggregating Rs 2,469 crore in the corresponding period last year.

As per the article publish by The Hindu Business Line on October 9, 2011, in the September quarter, some of the companies that came up for restructuring include: GTL Infrastructure (exposure of banks to this company is Rs 10,000 crore), Chennai Network Infrastructure (Rs 6,000 crore), GTL (Rs 5,000 crore); KS Oils, SBQ Steels (between Rs 1,000 crore and Rs 2,000 crore each), Empee Sugars & Chemicals, Gold Plus Glass Industry (about Rs 400 crore each), Soni Ispat, Maruti Cotex, and Metalman Industries (about Rs 200 crore each).

Interest rate rise is just one among the plethora of problems that corporates are dealing with in the current adverse macroeconomic scenario. Bankers also fault the multiple banking arrangements, whereby, each bank independently appraises a project and extends credit, for some corporate becoming overleveraged.
Overall, in the first six months of the current financial year, 35 corporates with debt aggregating Rs 34,562 crore were admitted for restructuring in the CDR cell in quarter ended September 30, 2011, against 20 corporates with debt aggregating Rs 5,033 crore in the corresponding period last year.

The CDR Cell was jointly floated by banks and financial institutions in 2001 to restructure debts of viable corporate entities affected by internal and external factors. Under CDR, creditors, among others, make concessions by reducing the interest rate, reschedule repayments, convert debt into equity/ preference shares, waive principal/ interest (to a limited extent), and convert working capital irregularity into working capital term loan.

CDR, according to the RBI guidelines, applies only to multiple banking accounts/ syndicates/ consortium accounts with outstanding exposure of Rs 10 crore and above with banks and financial institutions. For a corporate account to be referred to the CDR Cell, the support of 60 per cent of creditors by number in addition to the support of 75 per cent of creditors by value is required with a view to make the decision making process more equitable.

This article is just a compilation of various news reports published by THE HINDU BUSINESS LINE in the month of Oct 2011.

Monday, October 3, 2011

Getting ready for Mergers & Acquisitions


History indicates that Companies across Globe predominantly focus on organic growth plan rather than inorganic growth plan. However the recent trend indicates a shift in the paradigm and the fact that Global M&A activity has reached $1.5 Trillion in the first half of 2011 itself, a 22% increase from last year levels, it clearly depicts the pace at which the gap between the organic and inorganic growth is reducing.
Sounds interesting, doesn’t it, but the primary question to be answered is “are you ready?” Is your Company enabled with perfect operating procedures and a well placed plan of action? Well, that’s the first step. Prepare yourself for the change, identify the right candidates, scrutinize and acquire the Company with perfect synergies and be ready for the post merger hiccups. It’s a marriage and you got to have the right bride to keep your family intact and grow it too!

Pre M&A Planning - Implementation of Standard Operating Procedures:
Setting up Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) is definitely a strategic planning process – a success factor for sustainable corporate development, which prepares the ground for long-term growth that creates value. Corporate strategy defines the company's vision, sets targets for the long term and outlines the nature and scope of its business. Effective strategies can give the company a decisive competitive edge.
There is of course no such thing as the right process for strategic planning. But, existing planning processes do clearly contain avoidable weaknesses, which must be identified and eliminated. Further, the Company ought to be prepared to minimize the losses from unavoidable weaknesses.
SOPs lets you put into operation documents such as plans, regulation, compliance, and policies. SOPs distil requirements contained in these documents into a format that can be used by internal / external members in their work environment.
It is essential to carefully structure the procedure system individually for each of the process / business segment and Company as a whole. Caution, too many standard operating procedures could lead to a breakdown of the whole System. Minimum recommended period for review list is three years and changes to the SOP should essentially be triggered by the process or the procedure changes or the adaptations, led by the internal site controlling procedure. A clear focus on updating the coherent standard operating procedures regularly is indispensable.
SOP implementation must be planned for the whole Company which would further be split into business segments SOPs and functional departments SOPs. The steps of planning must begin with target planning, i.e., identification of vision, mission and goals. Next step should be strategic analysis (both external and internal analysis) of the Company situation as a whole and for each of the business segment. Post which careful formulation, selection and implementation of the strategy must be executed. Strategy must include product and business portfolio management plans, designing of structures and systems to achieve Company & Management goals and formulating & quantifying competitive strategies. The process definitely doesn’t end here and without performance measurement the entire hard work will have no value. It is very essential to track implementation success through operational checks and performance feedback from each of the business segment and functional department. Finally, corrective actions in case of issues identified would prepare the Company to proceed to the next step.

Key questions to be addressed while setting up the SOPs are:
Pitfalls in the existing system - Effectiveness of your early warning system - Sufficient attention to what competitors are doing – Underpinning of strategic alternatives with quantitative data – Fortification of value-based management - Strategic planning must be bridged with the medium-term and operational planning -Effective strategy implementation tracking system – Transparency in information flow to secure active commitment from the employees.

Pre M&A Planning – Acquisition Strategy:
The acquisition strategies are no different than any other strategic plan or work plan. Development of criterion before an investigation on possible acquisition targets and set up of goals to focus on the time and energy to the type the right candidate. Prior to scouting of targets, the Company must have absolute clarity on its vision and mission and identify its weak spots. The targets identified for acquisition would either assist the acquirer in overcoming its flaws or contribute directly to the primary aim – growth. The targets being looked at for acquisition should result in positive post merger synergies.
Determination of the financial resources to acquire the potential candidates or identification of the source of acquisition financing is another important step for planning. Any blemish on the acquisition financing plans could mark the beginning of doom for the acquirer.
A Pre Merger Planning would be a blueprint for the entire M&A transaction. Continuous research on potential acquisition candidates and developing the business cases for and against acquisition is essential to optimize resource utilization. Of course, like any other strategic plan, pre merger planning is also a dynamic document which will need to be tailored for each of the targets and each of the situational changes.
It is important for the acquiring Company to understand the Acquisition Risk, Integration Risk and Alignment Risk involved in the process, mitigation of which must be factored in the M&A Plan.

M&A Planning:
One would need to consider nature of the transaction, minimum (and maximum) income, geographical location, geographical coverage, years and post-merger management in the home, the ability to transfer Business, turn-around situation, capital requirements continue to grow the business and / or service line of products for your existing business.
The core areas of investigation on the target company should be on the Business Context (historical – current – future), Structure & Composition of the Board, Leadership Team and Business Units, Identification of Critical Positions and Key Contributors (High Potentials; High Performers; “Rising Stars”), Culture Analysis, Analysis of Talent Strategy & Mindset.
It would be useful to determine well in advance the information which will be needed to make an informed decision and look at only serious players who must be willing to realistically meet your needs, their responsiveness and maintain the necessary documentation.
Absolute clarity on the acquisition strategy and growth plan is necessary for the acquiring Company. This should be effectively communicated to the target Company once the decision to acquire is crystallized. A proper communication plan pre M&A is essential to ease the post M&A hiccups.
Due diligence is an important process while considering the targets to be acquired. In spite of an external consultant work on the DD, it is good to have an expert on the board to integrate the various DD reports delivered by different experts like CAs, Lawyers and technical experts.
Valuation is the key in any M&A Transaction to make or break the deal. Clear understanding on the value add by an internal expert is essential, to assess the post integration synergies for the Company.
M&A Plan must contain a detailed insight into the business and organizational risks associated with the degree of fit and match with the target company in terms of people and culture. Acquiring Company must clearly understand the target company’s overall leadership capability and talent inventory. It is essential to identify key leaders who could be targeted for specific retention initiatives, critical positions and post-integration strategic succession planning.

Post M&A Integration
It doesn’t end with a deal closure, an infallible post M&A integration strategy needs to be in place in order to achieve the objectives of the transaction. The skeleton plan will need to be modified and adapted to the specific acquisition targets based on their purchased goods, technologies and techniques to grow both companies together. Since the acquisition may represent a considerable investment of capital, resources and time, in the Companies’ own interest, the integration should be made as easy as possible. A thorough action plan framed by the management along with the consultants and experts in the areas of need is required for a successful result.
M&A creates value only when the value of synergies exceeds the acquisition premium paid. The integration plan must identify and unlock the full value post M&A which should include enhancing revenue and asset efficiency, reducing OPEX and cost of capital as well as tightly monitoring integration costs. Industry-specific benchmarks and synergy opportunity must enable the Company to spot the areas with the greatest value potential in addition to the regular consolidation and reconfiguration benefits.
It is vital to have a “road map” for a smooth integration process that further reduces key talent and customer “run off” and that does not distract key personnel from maintaining the focus on achieving the necessary synergies to achieving value.
The best practices on operating procedures set up in the Company will aid in easy adaption post M&A. Based on the integration master plan, the new business and operating model should be clarified and effectively put into place. Continuous meaningful communication and a cultural change program will be needed to ensure sustainable employee support of the merger.
Change and resource management towards success will be the key objectives from the Day One post integration. The entire focus of the strategy and structure development must be on organizational and management alignment through an accelerated transition. The spot light must be on the priority initiatives with clear communication of the same to all the stakeholders.
M&A process is not standing ahead alone but standing ahead together!

Written by: CA. Aparna RamMohan
Source: Published in the Sep 2011 issue of the News Bulletin of KSCAA (same author)

Factors affecting Business Valuation (Part 2)


Let us continue with our previous month’s discussion on the factors affecting business valuation.

Reliance / non-reliance on founder
The background, capacity and profile of the founder(s) of the organization speak a lot about a Company. The weight given to the profile or background of the promoter increases if the Company is either directly run by the promoter(s) themselves or management team of the Company is dependent on the directions of the promoter(s) for its functioning. But, if the Company is more in the hands of a team of professionals, then, that weight placed on the reliance on founder automatically comes down. The reliance factor of the promoter plays an important role as the guiding principles and the method of operation of the Company is designed by them.

The Financial Aspect
The value of assets and liabilities and the financial condition of the business is one of the obvious measures of valuing a Company. The values of the assets and liabilities can be based on the book value or the market value. One should attach a valuation based on what you know rather than an assumption. Though, assumption plays a key role in the process of valuation, what is primary is to consider what is available as a fact or certified fact. Audited Financial statements provide a true and fair view of the overall financial status of the Company. However, optimistic a future projection of the Company is, what is underlying is their past history. Due weight must be given to the past trend of the financial condition of the Company.

The earning capacity
The primary driver for any Company is its earning, so naturally, earning capacity of a company is the primary driver of its value too. The preferred measure of earning capacity for the purpose of valuation is Cash Flow as it represents a purer form of earnings.  Adjusting the net income or loss of a company for the items like depreciation & amortization, non-recurring items, transactions with your own self, discretionary expenses, interest expenses, common errors and the like produces a cash flow figure that represents a much more accurate picture of the earning capacity of a company.

Dividend paying capacity
While valuing a business, better consideration is given to the dividend-paying capacity of the company rather than to dividends actually paid in the past. Retention of a rational portion of profits in a company to meet competition must gain more recognition. For example, dividends paid out in a closely held Company is generally dependent on the needs of the shareholders or by their methods of tax planning, instead of by the ability of the company to pay dividends. The controlling team can choose salaries and bonuses as alternates for dividends, thus reducing net income and understating the dividend-paying capacity of the company. Since, the declaration of dividends is discretionary with the controlling shareholders, dividend payments are considered less reliable criteria of fair market value than the capacity to pay.

Intangible assets and goodwill
Valuation of intangible assets and goodwill are made based on certain generally accepted principles of calculation. Many times, intangible assets and goodwill calculation is given less importance due to the complexity of their calculation. But, when valued and considered, the intangibles become a major consideration in the process of valuation. Valuation of the business considers the high value of the business intangibles and their impact on the future success of the business. The intangibles many times are specifically noted as the major source of company growth and success after the business purchase.

The size of the block to be valued
The effect of fund size has an on the valuation of the business. There exists a convex relationship between fund size and the valuations. The valuation is positively correlated to measures of limited attention such as fund size per shareholder and excess fund size per shareholder.

The marketability of shares
Lack of Marketability of the shares is one of the most common discounts considered in business valuation.  It directly has a monetary impact on the determination of the final value. This is because marketability is directly related to the ability to convert an investment into cash quickly at a known price and with minimal transaction costs. Similarly, a higher capability to market the shares results in improvement of the business value. A valuation professional cannot directly apply the discounts based on average method based on industry, a thorough analysis of the characteristics of the business and a rational must support the discount on account of marketability factor.

Rights attached to shares
Controlling interest level is the value that an investor would be willing to pay to acquire more than 50% of a company’s stock, thereby gaining the attendant prerogatives of control. Some of the prerogatives of control include electing directors, hiring and firing the company’s management and
determining their compensation;  declaring dividends and distributions, determining the company’s
strategy and line of business, and acquiring, selling or liquidating the business. This level of value generally contains a control premium over the intermediate level of value, which typically ranges from 25% to 50%. An additional premium may be paid by strategic investors who are motivated by synergistic motives.

The first discount that must be considered is the discount for lack of control, which in this instance is
also a minority interest discount. Minority interest discounts are the inverse of control premiums, to which the following mathematical relationship exists: MID = 1 – [1 / (1 + CP)]. Mergerstat defines the “control premium” as the percentage difference between the acquisition price and the share price of the freely-traded public shares five days prior to the announcement of the M&A transaction.

Rights attached to minority interests
The intermediate level, marketable minority interest, is lesser than the controlling interest level and higher than the non-marketable minority interest level. The marketable minority interest level represents the perceived value of equity interests that are freely traded without any restrictions.  These interests are generally traded on the stock exchanges where there is a ready market for equity securities. These values represent a minority interest in the subject companies which are small blocks of stock that represent less than 50% of the company’s equity. 

Non-marketable, minority level is the lowest level on the chart, representing the level at which non-controlling equity interests in private companies are generally valued or traded. This level of value is discounted because no ready market exists in which to purchase or sell interests. Private companies are less “liquid” than publicly-traded companies, and transactions in private companies take longer and are more uncertain. Between the intermediate and lowest levels of the chart, there are restricted shares of publicly-traded companies.

Valuation discounts are actually increasing as the differences between public and private companies is widening . Publicly-traded stocks have grown more liquid in the past decade due to rapid electronic trading, reduced commissions, and governmental deregulation.  These developments have not improved the liquidity of interests in private companies, however. Valuation discounts are multiplicative, so they must be considered in order. Control premiums and their inverse, minority interest discounts, are considered before marketability discounts are applied.

Written by: CA. Aparna RamMohan
Source: Published in the Feb 2011 issue of the News Bulletin of KSCAA (same author)

Factors affecting Business Valuation


Last month, we got introduced to the world of valuation. Our discussion on what is valuation, characteristics of a good business valuation model and a brief on the approaches of valuation got us started. Let us move on to the next phase of discussion, which is on the factors affecting a business value.
In an environment as dynamic as prevalent in a business world, definitely, there are more than one factor which determines the growth, sustainability and value of a business. The factors affecting the value obviously differ with industry, scale, location, market so on and so forth. If we start listing down all of them to analyse its affect on value then valuation will become a never ending too complicated a process. Hence, one of the generally accepted rules is to consider the “relevant” valuation factors affecting the performance of the business.
Each case needs a careful consideration of the factors affecting the business in a significant manner. To list down a few of the commonly considered factors while valuing a business are:
·         The nature of the business and its history,
·         Business Growth
·         Customer Base
·         Audited Financial Statements
·         Litigation and Disputes
·         Minimize Discretionary Spending
·         Deal Structure
·         Role of management, vision, and strategy,
  • Staff competency
  • Reliance / non-reliance on founder
·         The book values of assets and liabilities, and the financial condition of the business,
·         The earning capacity,
·         Dividend paying capacity,
·         Intangible assets and goodwill,
·         The size of the block to be valued,
·         The marketability of shares,
·         Rights attaching to shares, minority interests,
·         Market share, and strategic positioning,
·         Risk/reward aspects,
·         Level of gearing, and
·         Accounting adjustments.
  • Business reputation
  • Potential for growth
  • Industry conditions
  • Superiority
  • Vulnerability
  • Political and economic outlook
  • Cash flow
  • Production capacity
  • Ability to increase revenues
  • Cost competitiveness
  • Business’s use of technology
  • Ability to reduce costs
  • Comparable businesses and industries
·         Prevailing legal issues
  • Potential to improve customer relationships
  • Ability to borrow against business or assets
  • Performance results and ratios
  • Location
  • Presentation of premises
  • Existing relationships with suppliers and customers
  • Intellectual property
  • Goodwill  and other intangibles
  • Condition of books and records
  • Computerisation
  • Tax implications
  • Alternative opportunities
  • Affordability
  • Working conditions
  • Property lease conditions
·         Rate of growth in the economy,
·         The amount of inflation,
·         Interest rates as well as the value of other stocks and bonds
·         Scale of operation
·         Barriers to entry
·         Whether the business has any monopolistic powers in buying or selling goods and services, or in intellectual property such as registered trade-marks and patents

Having listed such a long list of factors that can affect business valuation, let us move on to understand each one of them in depth:

Nature and history of the business
The first impression about a business is totally dependent on its history and the nature of business it is into. A business with strong background and a success story behind its growth earns more attention and value. The decision of considering a business for purchase or investment is based on its prior years’ growth pattern and its future projection of further growth. Another related factor is the nature of business, whether the current market conditions are favourable to its sustainability and growth or not.

Business Growth
What is that buyers look for? Growth!!! If a business can display methodical quality revenue and earnings growth, then the business valuation will be favourable. It helps to improve the value if future growth prospects can be substantiated and clearly articulated to the buyer.

Customer Base
The growth of a business is directly proportional to the growth of revenue which again depends on the growth in customer base. If a business has a diverse customer base, then its value will be higher than the businesses dependent on a few key customers only. If the top ten customers constitute more than 50% of the revenue for the year, then, this factor will have a negative impact on valuation.

Audited Financial Statements
An audited financial statement improves the certainty and accuracy of the numbers presented by the business, as it represents a third party confirmation by an independent qualified professional. The audited financial statement by a reputed auditor adds value. An unaudited financial statement leads to uncertainty prompting the buyer to increase their risk premium thereby reducing the valuation of the venture.

Management Team
Management team plays a key role in determination of the value of the business. The quality of the management teams is one of the most important requirements for silent buyers like a private equity or a venture capitalist firm. Whenever the silent buyers’ role is only to invest in the Company and not to manage it, the investments are based on various projections and future potential of the Company. In such cases, the investor places more reliance on those businesses, wherein, the management capacity and capability to run the show is better. A professional and experienced management team can add value.

Competency of the Staff
The value of the Company is not only affected by the management team but also by the key employees of the organization. The employees who fit into the definition of key employees are those who manage the important functions of the organization, eg: operation head, plant in charge, warehouse in charge, finance head, HR head etc. Having too many employees does not help as it shows a lower per employee efficiency, similarly, an understaffed business also looses value as the organization becomes dependent on the available employees and the loss of those employees could be detrimental to the business.

Litigation and Disputes
Exhibition of any kind of legal and / or customer dispute to the buyer or investor will only lead to reducing the value of the business. It does not mean that a business with disputes cannot be sold at all. The seller has to ensure that all the legal and / or customer disputes pertaining to the business is solved and closed before the organization is marketed for sale. The mistake of slaying a litigation or dispute will not help, as if it gets detected in the due diligence, then, this could be a major deal breaker. In addition to the buyer walking out of the deal, the price of your business to others in the market will also be significantly reduced.

Minimize Discretionary Spending
Strictly keep the personal expenses away from the Company’s books. Personal expenses how much ever supported by documents are “personal”. If detected by the due diligence team or the buyer, the personal expenses will be reduced from the total expenses shown in your books for the purpose of valuation. Further, buyers or investors will become sceptical of substantial discretionary add-backs and will price the business accordingly.

Deal Structure
Tax implications of a deal structure needs to be clearly understood. It is not only what the seller gets from the sale of the organization that matters, what matters is ultimately what you keep. The deal structure has to be beneficial to the seller not only with respect to the sale proceeds but with respect to the net sale proceeds. It is important to consider the tax liabilities and other liabilities arising from the business incorporation status and hold back provisions. What the seller finally retains is the sale proceeds after discounting such liabilities. It is advisable to analyse asset vs. equity sales, earn-outs, sinking fund provisions, capital etc before the decision for sale is taken.


Written by: CA. Aparna RamMohan
Source: Published in the Jan 2011 issue of the News Bulletin of KSCAA (same author)